🔗 Share this article

This is Black History Month in the UK, and it feels like it’s time for a rethink. As time has passed, an event that was initiated as a festivity and recollection of history, culture and the connections between global Black communities, has developed a business-like atmosphere, broadening to incorporate functions where Black people are compensated to speak with predominantly white listeners about implicit prejudice and supportive partnership. The demonstrations for racial justice in the 2020s sparked an increase in the industry of displaying cultural sensitivity. However, that period has concluded. The tide has peaked, producing a diluted aftermath of what promoting consciousness is for.

The Origins of Black History Celebration

First commemorated in the US and Canada, Black History Month was established in 1962 as an observance of African American heritage by African American historian Carter G. Woodson with multiple days of remembrance and recognition in the February's second week. Black History Month grew out of this campaign and was officially launched in 1970. Now it is celebrated not only in the North America in the second month, but also in autumn in the UK, Germany, the Republic of Ireland and the Holland.

The observance has transformed since those days, giving reduced attention to the histories of colonial slavery and fights for racial justice, and increasingly on prominent Black figures in government, the arts, and social movements, and extensively acknowledging the impact Black people have made to mold society. It is in educational institutions where Black History Month is most commonly celebrated, with discussions and heritage festivities. But the method the observance is observed is a reflection of the current political situation. How it develops is a good lesson in how assimilation leads to weakening: the transformation of Black History Month has hindered the purpose of it, which is to address structural and organizational discrimination.

---

A Disconcerting Period

Few things illustrate how crucial it is to reconsider Black History Month better than the particular moment in which it occurs this year. In the United Kingdom, a resurgent right in the guise of the Reform organization is ahead in surveys. In the warmer months we saw the biggest extreme right demonstration in the UK's past. a prominent political figure, the person of color at the helm of the right-wing political group, is a strong critic of the racial justice movement, and we are in a position where a member of parliament feels emboldened to state that the absence of Caucasian individuals in parts of a city is a reason for concern. At the same time, far-right parties are surging in the EU as a whole.

In the United States, a colossal assault against inclusion programs and preferential policies has been carried, repeatedly with positive outcomes, to the top legal institutions of the country. A campaign to erase African American heritage and narrative from the records is under way. One of Donald Trump's early administrative commands targeted the National Museum of African American History and Culture, and the Smithsonian Institution, accusing them of a organized and extensive campaign to change the national past” by depicting the United States “as fundamentally prejudiced”.

In this context, the observance illustrates how minimally it can be effective if it is restricted to either routine organizational acknowledgments, or depoliticized commemorations of contributions in the past, rather than challenging the realities of the contemporary world. It also reveals how its restricted time span means that it is disconnected from the more extensive continuous action that is needed. An academic expert, a professor at University of Greenwich, expressed it perfectly when she expressed apprehension about the short-term symbolic gestures of the observance. “The difficulty with adopting a symbolic stance”, she wrote, “is that it frequently results in that Black History Month evolves into a brief show rather than a driver of transformation.”

---

Reconsidering, Not Discarding

Determining how to adapt, revise and extend initiatives for fair treatment and appreciation in such moments of dejection and worry is a treacherous thing. There is a urge to just do away with observances such as Black History Month entirely, assuming they are no longer suitable, or are relics of an time that has failed to deliver.

Yet, in spite of all this, Black History Month, and in fact the entire extended network and heritage of racial movements – local anti-racism groups, DEI programs, and indeed, including corporate presentations – constitute an foundation that a considerable labor has been dedicated to. It is there not merely to decline as the situation evolves (and in fact, declines), but to be a vital organism.

So what would a new dynamic Black History Month seem? Firstly, it would be not just one concentrated month: something that is dispersed through the year (as certain organizations are already beginning to do), elements of its material (particularly around prominent figures of color) integrated into school curriculums. It would also be a time that does not shy away from governmental matters, and provides room for individuals, particularly youth, to share their anxieties and narratives. What value has basic knowledge of the history when it fails to address the contemporary truth of far-right rallies in the urban areas? Organizations who mark it should not be pacified with the neutral terminology of implicit prejudice and awareness of minor insults, but challenged by the risks that impact society if anti-racism is not approached earnestly. To summarize, Black History Month should be made up-to-date, urgent, and adaptive. Perhaps an complete renaming is in order – Contemporary Black History Month.